lytriada.blogg.se

Best astronomy software 2018
Best astronomy software 2018








best astronomy software 2018
  1. #Best astronomy software 2018 how to#
  2. #Best astronomy software 2018 update#

Therefore, credit and the lack of credit academics receive for their software became the driving force behind subsequent discussions. The groups framed their conversations and focused the majority of their discussion around perceived social and technical barriers that impact people’s ability to give and receive credit for their code. Throughout the splinter meeting, the discussion groups eventually all came to focus predominantly on what was perceived as the primary motivating factor for implementing the principles in astronomy: giving credit for research software. the need to give credit to academic researchers of all levels for the software that they develop. 4.the importance of research reproducibility and.the need to enable software discoverability.the need for a complete record of the research process.The FORCE11 Software Citation Working Group identified four primary motivations for developing the software citation principles in 2016: Recurrent Themes from Discussion Groups Motivations for Software Citation in Astronomy A scribe at each table took notes about the ensuing conversation and presented highlights from the discussion at the end of the meeting. Sloan Foundation to the AAS for the Asclepias project was used to fund the splinter meeting.Īttendees were given prompts ( Appendix B) after the presentations and asked to discuss the issues outlined within the prompts.

#Best astronomy software 2018 update#

The splinter meeting at AAS was 90 minutes long, beginning with three brief presentations: an update about the current FORCE11 Software Citation Principles Implementation Working Groupe 1 the diversity of software being produced by the astronomy community  2 and the on-going Asclepias project 3 from the AAS. The goal was to have representation by software authors, developers, journal editors, indexers, and librarians in each group to the extent that this was possible. Structure of the MeetingĪttendees were organized into five groups of five to seven people before the session began to ensure that each discussion group was made up of people representing a mix of relevant perspectives.

#Best astronomy software 2018 how to#

This is not a comprehensive list of all topics discussed by all attendees at the meeting, but will hopefully serve to instigate further discussion and invite disruptive ideas about how to best share increasingly complex, continually changing, digital research artifacts like software. The purpose of this document is to summarize the perceptions expressed during the splinter meeting, and to define a few concrete next steps that can be taken to lower perceived barriers. The meeting organizers aimed to identify some of the social and technical hurdles that affect software citation practices in astronomy and to understand factors that distinguish it from other fields where software citation is increasingly essential.

best astronomy software 2018

The goal of the splinter meeting was to gather feedback from astronomers, developers, and others whose expertise could inform the creation of resources to support the implementation of those principles. With these facts in mind, on Janua “splinter meeting” was held at the 231st Meeting of the AAS that focused on implementing the FORCE11 Software Citation Principles ( Appendix A) in Astronomy. Efforts to help authors receive proper academic credit will allow them to prioritize writing software valuable for the astronomy community within their current profession or the ability to focus their whole career on it.

best astronomy software 2018

Deep intellectual contributions are being made by people creating software to enable scientific research, and it is essential that software creators are encouraged to create these valuable resources. Software citation is foundationally important to the future of astronomy. The original summary, prepared by Daina Bouquin and Arfon Smith, is on GitHub, and is reproduced here with permission. This week’s post is a repost of a summary of a meeting held at the 231st American Astronomical Society (AAS) meeting in National Harbor, Maryland, USA, January 2018.










Best astronomy software 2018